header-logo header-logo

All change for social housing?

20 January 2012 / James Driscoll
Issue: 7497 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

James Driscoll unravels the principles & practicalities of the Localism Act 2011

A recent government announcement to make illegal subletting of social housing a criminal offence (CLG announcement, 10 January 2012) has attracted much publicity. What has received far less publicity, until now, at any rate, are the housing law and policy changes introduced by the Localism Act 2011 (LA 2011) which had Royal Assent in November 2011 and which are more far-reaching in their effects on social housing. 

Some of the housing provisions under the new Act came into force on 15 January 2012 (under the Localism Act 2011 (Commencement No. 2 and Transitional and Saving Provision) Order 2012 (SI 2012/57 (C.2)). The remainder are expected to come into force in April 2012. One principle underlying LA 2011, according to government, is to decentralise political decisions, and this informs many of the housing law changes in Pt 7 of LA 2011. Another principle is to allow local housing authorities the option of granting a secure tenancy for a fixed term
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll