header-logo header-logo

MoJ proceed with Crown Court testing

11 June 2009
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-detail

Legal aid

The Ministry of Justice announced this week that it will proceed with proposals outlined in its consultation paper, Crown Court Means Testing. This means defendants will pay legal aid contributions if they have annual disposable income of more than £3,398, capital assets of more than £3,000, or £30,000 of equity in their homes. If acquitted, the money would be paid back with interest. Acquitted defendants who do not qualify for legal aid or want to pay privately will no longer be able to recover all of their costs.

Justice Minister Lord Bach says: “We have been listening to those involved in the criminal justice system and the general public, who in the majority support this approach...The reforms we are making to legal aid are part of our promise to deliver real help now to those most in need, while developing an economically sustainable system that ensures fair and equitable access to all.”

However, legal campaign group JUSTICE condemned the plans for “undermining the principle of innocent until proven guilty”. Senior legal officer Sally Ireland says: “Innocent people should not suffer financially because the
state has decided to prosecute them. Defendants should only pay costs once they are convicted.”

Issue: 7373 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll