header-logo header-logo

MoJ proceed with Crown Court testing

11 June 2009
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-detail

Legal aid

The Ministry of Justice announced this week that it will proceed with proposals outlined in its consultation paper, Crown Court Means Testing. This means defendants will pay legal aid contributions if they have annual disposable income of more than £3,398, capital assets of more than £3,000, or £30,000 of equity in their homes. If acquitted, the money would be paid back with interest. Acquitted defendants who do not qualify for legal aid or want to pay privately will no longer be able to recover all of their costs.

Justice Minister Lord Bach says: “We have been listening to those involved in the criminal justice system and the general public, who in the majority support this approach...The reforms we are making to legal aid are part of our promise to deliver real help now to those most in need, while developing an economically sustainable system that ensures fair and equitable access to all.”

However, legal campaign group JUSTICE condemned the plans for “undermining the principle of innocent until proven guilty”. Senior legal officer Sally Ireland says: “Innocent people should not suffer financially because the
state has decided to prosecute them. Defendants should only pay costs once they are convicted.”

Issue: 7373 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll