header-logo header-logo

11 June 2009
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-detail

MoJ proceed with Crown Court testing

Legal aid

The Ministry of Justice announced this week that it will proceed with proposals outlined in its consultation paper, Crown Court Means Testing. This means defendants will pay legal aid contributions if they have annual disposable income of more than £3,398, capital assets of more than £3,000, or £30,000 of equity in their homes. If acquitted, the money would be paid back with interest. Acquitted defendants who do not qualify for legal aid or want to pay privately will no longer be able to recover all of their costs.

Justice Minister Lord Bach says: “We have been listening to those involved in the criminal justice system and the general public, who in the majority support this approach...The reforms we are making to legal aid are part of our promise to deliver real help now to those most in need, while developing an economically sustainable system that ensures fair and equitable access to all.”

However, legal campaign group JUSTICE condemned the plans for “undermining the principle of innocent until proven guilty”. Senior legal officer Sally Ireland says: “Innocent people should not suffer financially because the
state has decided to prosecute them. Defendants should only pay costs once they are convicted.”

Issue: 7373 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll