header-logo header-logo

11 June 2009
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

MoD facing unwanted Christmas present

Personal injury

Ex-servicemen who took part in nuclear tests in the South Pacific in the 1950s have won the right to bring a class action against the Ministry of Defence.

More than 1,000 men claim to have suffered illhealth following the tests on Christmas Island, the Australian mainland and the Montebello islands off the Australian coast, between October 1952 and September 1958.

They claim that a 2007 report into a group of New Zealand veterans, The Rowland Report, demonstrates a link between the radiation to which they were exposed and their conditions, which have included cancer and skin defects.

Some 40,000 servicemen were present at the tests, more than 20,000 of which were British. The tests included six detonations at Christmas Island of weapons more powerful than those discharged at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Witnesses recall holding up their hands and seeing their bones exposed as an X-ray.

The High Court ruled last week that all 10 of the test cases could go ahead—five had been statute-barred under the Limitation Act 1980, but Mr Justice Foskett ruled that he could exercise his discretion under s 33 of the Act to allow them to proceed.

Issue: 7373 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll