header-logo header-logo

Life in the automated lane

49941
The legal & regulatory landscape surrounding automated vehicles is taking shape: David Mason considers the questions still to be answered
  • The implementation of Pt 1 of the Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018 opens the door for fundamental changes to the civil liability of drivers and insurers.

With the recent implementation of Pt 1 of the Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018 (AEVA 2018), the government has taken the first steps towards the lawful use of vehicles on our roads which are controlled by technology, not the driver.

AEVA 2018 is not concerned with the driver assistance devices now commonly available on cars, such as active cruise control or lane monitoring. The legal position is clear so far as they are concerned: the driver remains in charge and fully responsible for the operation of the vehicle.

AEVA 2018 introduces a new class of vehicle—the ‘automated vehicle’—and new concepts of liability for their drivers, and crucially, their insurers.

What’s automated?

An automated vehicle is one which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll