header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
28 May 2021 / David Mason
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Features , Technology , Insurance / reinsurance , Personal injury , Criminal , Health & safety
printer mail-detail

Life in the automated lane

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
49941
The legal & regulatory landscape surrounding automated vehicles is taking shape: David Mason considers the questions still to be answered
  • The implementation of Pt 1 of the Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018 opens the door for fundamental changes to the civil liability of drivers and insurers.

With the recent implementation of Pt 1 of the Automated and Electric Vehicles Act 2018 (AEVA 2018), the government has taken the first steps towards the lawful use of vehicles on our roads which are controlled by technology, not the driver.

AEVA 2018 is not concerned with the driver assistance devices now commonly available on cars, such as active cruise control or lane monitoring. The legal position is clear so far as they are concerned: the driver remains in charge and fully responsible for the operation of the vehicle.

AEVA 2018 introduces a new class of vehicle—the ‘automated vehicle’—and new concepts of liability for their drivers, and crucially, their insurers.

What’s automated?

An automated vehicle is one which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

NLJ Career Profile: Nick Vernon, Walkers Bermuda

Nick Vernon of Walkers on swapping Birmingham for Bermuda and building an employment practice by the sea

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Bird & Bird—Christian Bartsch

Global firm re-elects CEO for second term

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Fletchers Group—Miriam Hall

Business appoints managing director of operational excellence

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll