header-logo header-logo

Life is a roller-coaster

15 May 2008 / Jennifer James
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Jennifer James turns the tables on her judicial colleagues…and exposes some idiosyncrasies of the system

The Insider has not previously written about sitting as a deputy judge for fear of (at worst) contempt of court, or (at best) falling foul of the wise words imparted to me by my sweet silver-haired mother, namely, don't poop where you eat.

However, over the past few years it has become clear that the position has got its pros and cons, and I can write about these in (hopefully) sufficiently vague terms so as not to awake the Kraken or anybody else at the Ministry of Justice. Here goes.

The Balanced Approach

Pro: Most of the full-time costs judges can hopefully sympathise with me in this heat wave as they have worn stockings, even though they are men. This is of course thanks to the formal attire required for the annual Opening of the Legal Year festivities and only thanks to that. No, stop messing about.

Con: Several of them have better legs than me.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll