header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-detail

Light at the end of the tunnel

Financial crisis makes success story of ADR

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) has been a major growth area in the UK in the last two years, with London’s dispute resolution sector in a “pre-eminent position” for international business disputes, suggests recent research.

The success of the ADR sector is partly due to the economic downturn, and will receive a further boost when the new Business, Property and Commercial Court opens in London in 2011.

A total of 34,541 disputes were resolved through arbitration and mediation in the UK in 2009, an increase of more than three-quarters on 2007 figures. Disputes mainly involving international parties rose by 59% over the same period to 5,297 in 2009, according to a report, Dispute resolution in London and the UK 2010, by TheCityUK, an independent financial industry membership body.

Duncan McKenzie, senior manager, economic research, at TheCityUK, says: “The main dispute resolution organisations have experienced a surge in referrals in recent years due to the economic recession and financial crisis.”

The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors handled the most referrals, with 8,845 in 2009. It was followed by the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators at 4,659 and the London Maritime Arbitrators’ Association with 4,445: both were up around two thirds from 2007. Disputes referred to the London Court of International Arbitration recorded the biggest increase, more than doubling from 137 to 285.

Khawar Qureshi QC, chairman of TheCityUK’s legal services and dispute resolution group, says the report confirms London’s pre-eminent position for international business disputes.
“The data in the report shows that the ADR sector has grown significantly in the aftermath of the financial crisis.”

In addition, the state of the art Business, Property and Commercial Court to be housed in the Rolls Building in London “will greatly enhance” the UK’s attraction as an international centre for litigation,” he says. The new court is scheduled to become operative next summer.

Issue: 7434 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , ADR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll