header-logo header-logo

28 May 2010
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Limitation of action

Roberts v Gill & Co and others [2010] UKSC 22, [2010] All ER (D) 180 (May)

The claimant brought an action against a solicitor regarding allegedly negligent administration of an estate. On appeal the primary question issue was whether an amendment sought by the claimant to his action could be made notwithstanding expiry of the limitation period, pursuant to s 35 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) and CPR 19.5 in respect of his personal claim.
In particular, the main question was whether, in order to be able to carry on his claim, the claimant would need not only to alter the claim so that he was suing on behalf of the estate, but also to add the administrator as a defendant. If he did have to add the administrator, a further question arose as to what would have to be added at the time at which he altered his claim or whether he could do so later.

The Supreme Court ruled that CPR 19.5(2)(b) and 19.5(3)(b) (giving effect to s 35(5)(b) and 6(b) of LA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Irwin Mitchell—Louisa Donaghy

Irwin Mitchell—Louisa Donaghy

National military team expands in Leeds with legal director appointment

Taylor Wessing—Jamie Humphreys

Taylor Wessing—Jamie Humphreys

Disputes and investigations team welcomes product liability partner hire

Spector Constant & Williams—Michael Michaeloudis and team

Spector Constant & Williams—Michael Michaeloudis and team

London firm launches employment department with four-lawyer team hire

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll