header-logo header-logo

28 May 2010
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Limitation of action

Roberts v Gill & Co and others [2010] UKSC 22, [2010] All ER (D) 180 (May)

The claimant brought an action against a solicitor regarding allegedly negligent administration of an estate. On appeal the primary question issue was whether an amendment sought by the claimant to his action could be made notwithstanding expiry of the limitation period, pursuant to s 35 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) and CPR 19.5 in respect of his personal claim.
In particular, the main question was whether, in order to be able to carry on his claim, the claimant would need not only to alter the claim so that he was suing on behalf of the estate, but also to add the administrator as a defendant. If he did have to add the administrator, a further question arose as to what would have to be added at the time at which he altered his claim or whether he could do so later.

The Supreme Court ruled that CPR 19.5(2)(b) and 19.5(3)(b) (giving effect to s 35(5)(b) and 6(b) of LA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll