header-logo header-logo

19 May 2011
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Limitation of action

Renwick and another v Simon and Michael Brooke Architects and other companies [2011] EWHC 874 (TCC), [2011] All ER (D) 36 (May)

The starting date for the three-year period under s 14A of the Limitation Act 1980 was the “earliest date” on which any given claimant had the knowledge required for bringing a claim in damages in relation to the damage with which the claim was concerned and the right to bring the claim.

Knowledge in that context did not mean certainty, but knowledge of sufficient essential facts or matters to institute either a claim or the taking of advice or the collation of evidence would often suffice to institute the “earliest date”. That “knowledge” was of the material facts about the damage for which damages were claimed and of other facts relevant to the claim.

Those were such facts as would lead a reasonable person who had suffered the damage in question to consider it sufficiently serious to justify instituting proceedings for damages; such facts included that the damage in question was attributable at least

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll