header-logo header-logo

23 March 2012
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Limitation of actions

AB and others v Ministry of Defence [2012] UKSC 9, [2012] All ER (D) 108 (Mar)

The inquiry mandated by s 14(1) of the Limitation Act 1980 was retrospective, namely whether the claimant first had knowledge of it within or outside the period of three years prior to the date of issue. A claimant was likely to have acquired knowledge of the facts specified in s 14 when he first came reasonably to believe them. Before it was to amount to knowledge for the purposes of s 14(1), the belief had to be held “with sufficient confidence to justify embarking on the preliminaries to the issue of a writ, such as submitting a claim to the proposed defendant, taking legal and other advice and collecting evidence”. The focus was upon the moment when it was reasonable for the claimant to embark on such an investigation. Once the requisite knowledge had arisen, the difficulty of establishing the claim conferred no right thereunder to a further, open-ended, extension of the time within which the action had to be brought.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll