header-logo header-logo

10 May 2024 / David Regan
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Features , Profession , Coronial law
printer mail-detail

Limitations of neglect at inquest

171871
David Regan explores the coronial role in defining the concept of neglect
  • Covers case law on neglect in an inquest.
  • Traces the evolution and scope of neglect.

A finding of neglect at the conclusion of an inquest can have profound implications, not least reputationally to those implicated in causing a death. It invariably carries with it an element of censure quite different from all of the short form conclusions that an inquest may return, except for unlawful killing. Neglect contributes to adversarial tensions in what is essentially an inquisitorial process. This is despite the fact that a finding of neglect is not a freestanding conclusion at all, but a ‘rider’ or adjunct to one.

That it is frequently misreported and misunderstood is perhaps not surprising considering its curious nature, as a judgmental finding in an essentially non-judgmental process. Although its application is relatively limited, the concept of neglect has played a significant role in pushing the boundaries of coronial law and in making the investigation of unnatural deaths by coroners

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll