header-logo header-logo

Limitations of neglect at inquest

10 May 2024 / David Regan
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Features , Profession , Coronial law
printer mail-detail
171871
David Regan explores the coronial role in defining the concept of neglect
  • Covers case law on neglect in an inquest.
  • Traces the evolution and scope of neglect.

A finding of neglect at the conclusion of an inquest can have profound implications, not least reputationally to those implicated in causing a death. It invariably carries with it an element of censure quite different from all of the short form conclusions that an inquest may return, except for unlawful killing. Neglect contributes to adversarial tensions in what is essentially an inquisitorial process. This is despite the fact that a finding of neglect is not a freestanding conclusion at all, but a ‘rider’ or adjunct to one.

That it is frequently misreported and misunderstood is perhaps not surprising considering its curious nature, as a judgmental finding in an essentially non-judgmental process. Although its application is relatively limited, the concept of neglect has played a significant role in pushing the boundaries of coronial law and in making the investigation of unnatural deaths by coroners

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll