header-logo header-logo

10 May 2024 / David Regan
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Features , Profession , Coronial law
printer mail-detail

Limitations of neglect at inquest

171871
David Regan explores the coronial role in defining the concept of neglect
  • Covers case law on neglect in an inquest.
  • Traces the evolution and scope of neglect.

A finding of neglect at the conclusion of an inquest can have profound implications, not least reputationally to those implicated in causing a death. It invariably carries with it an element of censure quite different from all of the short form conclusions that an inquest may return, except for unlawful killing. Neglect contributes to adversarial tensions in what is essentially an inquisitorial process. This is despite the fact that a finding of neglect is not a freestanding conclusion at all, but a ‘rider’ or adjunct to one.

That it is frequently misreported and misunderstood is perhaps not surprising considering its curious nature, as a judgmental finding in an essentially non-judgmental process. Although its application is relatively limited, the concept of neglect has played a significant role in pushing the boundaries of coronial law and in making the investigation of unnatural deaths by coroners

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll