header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011 / Sarah Rushton
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Company , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Limited partnerships?

The status of partners is a risky business, says Sarah Rushton

IN BRIEF

  • Partnerships and LLPs should not overlook the fact that equity partners have “employee” rights. They are protected by the Equality Act and can bring employment tribunal claims.

Prior to 2001, partnerships were governed by the terms of their deed and, in default, the terms of the Partnership Act 1890. However, since 2001 there has been an alternative structure for partners. Under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000, two or more people wishing to carry on business together can do so as an LLP. The relationship between the members of an LLP is covered by the membership agreement.

There has been considerable legal debate around the issue of partnership and LLPs and whether or not different classes of partners or members are truly self employed partners or employees. To the outside world, a “partner” is simply someone who is held out as such, but the term partner can actually mean many different things: full equity, fixed share, salaried etc.

Where concerns

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll