header-logo header-logo

Limited partnerships?

02 June 2011 / Sarah Rushton
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Company , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The status of partners is a risky business, says Sarah Rushton

IN BRIEF

  • Partnerships and LLPs should not overlook the fact that equity partners have “employee” rights. They are protected by the Equality Act and can bring employment tribunal claims.

Prior to 2001, partnerships were governed by the terms of their deed and, in default, the terms of the Partnership Act 1890. However, since 2001 there has been an alternative structure for partners. Under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000, two or more people wishing to carry on business together can do so as an LLP. The relationship between the members of an LLP is covered by the membership agreement.

There has been considerable legal debate around the issue of partnership and LLPs and whether or not different classes of partners or members are truly self employed partners or employees. To the outside world, a “partner” is simply someone who is held out as such, but the term partner can actually mean many different things: full equity, fixed share, salaried etc.

Where concerns

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll