header-logo header-logo

Limited partnerships?

02 June 2011 / Sarah Rushton
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Company , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The status of partners is a risky business, says Sarah Rushton

IN BRIEF

  • Partnerships and LLPs should not overlook the fact that equity partners have “employee” rights. They are protected by the Equality Act and can bring employment tribunal claims.

Prior to 2001, partnerships were governed by the terms of their deed and, in default, the terms of the Partnership Act 1890. However, since 2001 there has been an alternative structure for partners. Under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000, two or more people wishing to carry on business together can do so as an LLP. The relationship between the members of an LLP is covered by the membership agreement.

There has been considerable legal debate around the issue of partnership and LLPs and whether or not different classes of partners or members are truly self employed partners or employees. To the outside world, a “partner” is simply someone who is held out as such, but the term partner can actually mean many different things: full equity, fixed share, salaried etc.

Where concerns

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll