header-logo header-logo

02 June 2011 / Sarah Rushton
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Company , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Limited partnerships?

The status of partners is a risky business, says Sarah Rushton

IN BRIEF

  • Partnerships and LLPs should not overlook the fact that equity partners have “employee” rights. They are protected by the Equality Act and can bring employment tribunal claims.

Prior to 2001, partnerships were governed by the terms of their deed and, in default, the terms of the Partnership Act 1890. However, since 2001 there has been an alternative structure for partners. Under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000, two or more people wishing to carry on business together can do so as an LLP. The relationship between the members of an LLP is covered by the membership agreement.

There has been considerable legal debate around the issue of partnership and LLPs and whether or not different classes of partners or members are truly self employed partners or employees. To the outside world, a “partner” is simply someone who is held out as such, but the term partner can actually mean many different things: full equity, fixed share, salaried etc.

Where concerns

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll