header-logo header-logo

LiPs on the loose

248989
© Getty images
The rise of litigants in person: Clare Hughes-Williams sets out how to respond to this growing challenge

Something that most litigators already know from their own, sometimes bitter, experience was confirmed by a House of Commons research briefing in January 2026—namely that the prevalence of litigants in person (LiPs) has increased considerably over the past few years.

The briefing paper (‘Access to justice: Legal aid and services’, 9 January 2026) draws on statistics from the National Audit Office which estimates that the number of LiPs conducting litigation in an unrepresented capacity in the family courts has increased by as much as 30%. The data is said to be unreliable, but civil litigators are also reporting significant increases in the number of LiPs dealing with their own cases, and this is certainly the case for all of our litigation teams.

As the authors of the briefing paper highlight, there is a real issue involving access to justice that is driving this trend. Many LiPs have no option

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll