header-logo header-logo

LiPs on the loose

248989
© Getty images
The rise of litigants in person: Clare Hughes-Williams sets out how to respond to this growing challenge

Something that most litigators already know from their own, sometimes bitter, experience was confirmed by a House of Commons research briefing in January 2026—namely that the prevalence of litigants in person (LiPs) has increased considerably over the past few years.

The briefing paper (‘Access to justice: Legal aid and services’, 9 January 2026) draws on statistics from the National Audit Office which estimates that the number of LiPs conducting litigation in an unrepresented capacity in the family courts has increased by as much as 30%. The data is said to be unreliable, but civil litigators are also reporting significant increases in the number of LiPs dealing with their own cases, and this is certainly the case for all of our litigation teams.

As the authors of the briefing paper highlight, there is a real issue involving access to justice that is driving this trend. Many LiPs have no option

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll