header-logo header-logo

Litigant in person commits abuse in court

03 November 2015
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mr Justice Mostyn has spoken out in court about the “abysmal” behaviour of a litigant in person who threatened judges, sent abusive e-mails and assaulted the opposing counsel.

The “routine” ancillary relief claim, involving net assets of about £1.3m, followed a 20-year marriage. Mostyn J questioned why a four-day hearing was listed in the High Court and why the wife had incurred costs of about £150,000.

“The answer is the conduct of the husband,” he said, in Veluppillai v Veluppillai​ [2015] EWHC 3095 (Fam). “It has been truly abysmal.”

He said more than 30 hearings including four appeals had been mounted by the husband since the claim was commenced in 2012. The man had made threats to kill the wife and her counsel, had had to be removed from the courtroom by security staff, and had been repeatedly warned by judges about his “unpleasant menacing conduct in court”.

Mostyn J said: “On one occasion he assaulted both the wife’s counsel and the wife in court for which he was later convicted of assault in the magistrates’ court. He skipped his sentencing hearing and fled abroad from where he has bombarded the court with abusive e-mails.”

A warrant for the man’s arrest has been issued by magistrates.

Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll