header-logo header-logo

Litigant in person commits abuse in court

03 November 2015
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mr Justice Mostyn has spoken out in court about the “abysmal” behaviour of a litigant in person who threatened judges, sent abusive e-mails and assaulted the opposing counsel.

The “routine” ancillary relief claim, involving net assets of about £1.3m, followed a 20-year marriage. Mostyn J questioned why a four-day hearing was listed in the High Court and why the wife had incurred costs of about £150,000.

“The answer is the conduct of the husband,” he said, in Veluppillai v Veluppillai​ [2015] EWHC 3095 (Fam). “It has been truly abysmal.”

He said more than 30 hearings including four appeals had been mounted by the husband since the claim was commenced in 2012. The man had made threats to kill the wife and her counsel, had had to be removed from the courtroom by security staff, and had been repeatedly warned by judges about his “unpleasant menacing conduct in court”.

Mostyn J said: “On one occasion he assaulted both the wife’s counsel and the wife in court for which he was later convicted of assault in the magistrates’ court. He skipped his sentencing hearing and fled abroad from where he has bombarded the court with abusive e-mails.”

A warrant for the man’s arrest has been issued by magistrates.

Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll