header-logo header-logo

03 November 2015
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Litigant in person commits abuse in court

Mr Justice Mostyn has spoken out in court about the “abysmal” behaviour of a litigant in person who threatened judges, sent abusive e-mails and assaulted the opposing counsel.

The “routine” ancillary relief claim, involving net assets of about £1.3m, followed a 20-year marriage. Mostyn J questioned why a four-day hearing was listed in the High Court and why the wife had incurred costs of about £150,000.

“The answer is the conduct of the husband,” he said, in Veluppillai v Veluppillai​ [2015] EWHC 3095 (Fam). “It has been truly abysmal.”

He said more than 30 hearings including four appeals had been mounted by the husband since the claim was commenced in 2012. The man had made threats to kill the wife and her counsel, had had to be removed from the courtroom by security staff, and had been repeatedly warned by judges about his “unpleasant menacing conduct in court”.

Mostyn J said: “On one occasion he assaulted both the wife’s counsel and the wife in court for which he was later convicted of assault in the magistrates’ court. He skipped his sentencing hearing and fled abroad from where he has bombarded the court with abusive e-mails.”

A warrant for the man’s arrest has been issued by magistrates.

Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll