header-logo header-logo

04 December 2014
Issue: 7633 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Litigants in person facing miscarriages of justice

Top judges express concern over increase of litigants in person

The increase in litigants in person (LiPs) will have led to miscarriages of justice, Lord Dyson, the Master of the Rolls, has told MPs.

Lord Dyson, giving evidence to the Justice Committee this week on the impact of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, said: “I’m sure there will be cases where a party has lost a case because he or she doesn’t have representation. It’s impossible to prove, but it would be extraordinary if there had not been some cases which were decided adversely that would have been decided the other way had the litigant been represented by a competent lawyer, it’s inevitable.”

He recalled one example told to him by a civil judge of a case where a technical legal point arose. If the claimant had been a lawyer, they would have picked up on the technical point and would have succeeded. As the claimant was unrepresented, they did not notice the point and lost their case.

Sir James Munby, head of the family division, also giving evidence, said there was less chance in the family courts of a LiP missing out because of a purely legal point. However, he added that he was “quite sure” that there are cases where judges will not spot a point that a lawyer would have picked up, and where that can “make the difference between victory and defeat”. “It would be foolish to believe there are not such cases,” he added.

Sir James told the committee that the court rules are “incredibly complex” and “the framework assumes representation”. Pre-trial preparation is very important, he said, but most LiPs “are not capable of preparing a bundle of documents… even if it is a lever arch file rather than a plastic bag, you cannot assume you have everything”.

He said a trial involving a LiP can be shorter because they tend to “dry up” in court but that the pre-trial hearing takes more time.

Lord Dyson agreed that LiPs can be “over-awed” in court, and that “they freeze, frankly”. He said problems arose at the pre-hearing stage where lawyers usually narrow the issues, focus on what matters and know what directions to ask for. LiPs need legal advice at an early stage, he added.

Issue: 7633 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll