header-logo header-logo

Litigants in person facing miscarriages of justice

04 December 2014
Issue: 7633 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Top judges express concern over increase of litigants in person

The increase in litigants in person (LiPs) will have led to miscarriages of justice, Lord Dyson, the Master of the Rolls, has told MPs.

Lord Dyson, giving evidence to the Justice Committee this week on the impact of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, said: “I’m sure there will be cases where a party has lost a case because he or she doesn’t have representation. It’s impossible to prove, but it would be extraordinary if there had not been some cases which were decided adversely that would have been decided the other way had the litigant been represented by a competent lawyer, it’s inevitable.”

He recalled one example told to him by a civil judge of a case where a technical legal point arose. If the claimant had been a lawyer, they would have picked up on the technical point and would have succeeded. As the claimant was unrepresented, they did not notice the point and lost their case.

Sir James Munby, head of the family division, also giving evidence, said there was less chance in the family courts of a LiP missing out because of a purely legal point. However, he added that he was “quite sure” that there are cases where judges will not spot a point that a lawyer would have picked up, and where that can “make the difference between victory and defeat”. “It would be foolish to believe there are not such cases,” he added.

Sir James told the committee that the court rules are “incredibly complex” and “the framework assumes representation”. Pre-trial preparation is very important, he said, but most LiPs “are not capable of preparing a bundle of documents… even if it is a lever arch file rather than a plastic bag, you cannot assume you have everything”.

He said a trial involving a LiP can be shorter because they tend to “dry up” in court but that the pre-trial hearing takes more time.

Lord Dyson agreed that LiPs can be “over-awed” in court, and that “they freeze, frankly”. He said problems arose at the pre-hearing stage where lawyers usually narrow the issues, focus on what matters and know what directions to ask for. LiPs need legal advice at an early stage, he added.

Issue: 7633 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll