header-logo header-logo

23 January 2020 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Litigation 2020

14453
Radical reforms are coming but all will be well, says Dominic Regan

The final instalment of the Jackson jigsaw will be delivered with a drastic extension of fixed costs. It was a decade ago that his interlocking measures were revealed. Sir Rupert set himself the challenge of devising a regime where justice could be delivered at proportionate, reasonable cost.

To that end he decided that a fixed costs regime should apply to lower value cases. While such costs have been introduced in personal injury, mainstream litigation has been left untouched. That is going to change. In July 2017 recommendations were made by Sir Rupert which the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) only responded to last year. Matters worth between £25,000 and £100,000 would have costs determined by reference to a matrix. Out will go costs management at the start of an action and detailed assessment would fall away at the end. Cases would be allocated to one of three bands, each one having a scale of costs that would understandably increase as the matter progressed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll