header-logo header-logo

Litigation funding gap

07 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

"Knowledge gap" between private practice lawyers & their clients

Solicitors and barristers are not doing enough to keep in-house counsel informed about the potential of litigation funding, new research has shown.

More than 80% of law firms and nearly half of chambers say they discuss litigation funding with their clients, according to a survey by Harbour Litigation Funding. The top three benefits cited were risk minimisation, cost and cash-flow control, and access to justice.  

However, the survey found a “knowledge gap” between private practice lawyers and their clients—only one in five in-house counsel were aware of litigation funding and none of them had any recollection of discussing the option with their external lawyers.

One in-house counsel said she was not “hugely familiar” with litigation funding and that law firms could do more to raise awareness “as to exactly what the tools are and what they can offer”.

Susan Dunn, Harbour’s head of litigation funding, says there is “more work still to be done to educate in-house counsel and dispel certain myths which develop from a lack of understanding”.

Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll