header-logo header-logo

07 February 2013
Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Litigation funding gap

"Knowledge gap" between private practice lawyers & their clients

Solicitors and barristers are not doing enough to keep in-house counsel informed about the potential of litigation funding, new research has shown.

More than 80% of law firms and nearly half of chambers say they discuss litigation funding with their clients, according to a survey by Harbour Litigation Funding. The top three benefits cited were risk minimisation, cost and cash-flow control, and access to justice.  

However, the survey found a “knowledge gap” between private practice lawyers and their clients—only one in five in-house counsel were aware of litigation funding and none of them had any recollection of discussing the option with their external lawyers.

One in-house counsel said she was not “hugely familiar” with litigation funding and that law firms could do more to raise awareness “as to exactly what the tools are and what they can offer”.

Susan Dunn, Harbour’s head of litigation funding, says there is “more work still to be done to educate in-house counsel and dispel certain myths which develop from a lack of understanding”.

Issue: 7547 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll