header-logo header-logo

20 April 2018 / Julian Acratopulo
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Litigation futures

nlj_7789_acratopulo

Uncertainty remains regarding the impact of Brexit on London’s legal community, as Julian Acratopulo explains

Notwithstanding that the 12 month countdown to 29 March 2019 has begun, uncertainty remains regarding the impact of Brexit on London’s legal community.

Perhaps of most immediate concern to London’s litigators is the uncertainty around jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement post-Brexit. This is because recognition of the jurisdiction of the English courts and the enforcement of its judgments in Europe currently depend primarily on the Brussels I Recast Regulation. The most recent draft of the European Commission Withdrawal Agreement, published on 19 March 2018, shows that EU and UK negotiators cannot yet agree on even the policy objectives in this area, let alone the detailed practicalities. Nine months on, this lack of progress does not sit comfortably with the plea made by Lord Thomas in July 2017 in his Mansion House speech to the judiciary for ‘urgent clarification’ and the ‘clearest commitment’ by the UK’s government on these issues. The likelihood of a transition deal and the government’s commitment to joining the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll