header-logo header-logo

20 April 2018 / Julian Acratopulo
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Litigation futures

nlj_7789_acratopulo

Uncertainty remains regarding the impact of Brexit on London’s legal community, as Julian Acratopulo explains

Notwithstanding that the 12 month countdown to 29 March 2019 has begun, uncertainty remains regarding the impact of Brexit on London’s legal community.

Perhaps of most immediate concern to London’s litigators is the uncertainty around jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement post-Brexit. This is because recognition of the jurisdiction of the English courts and the enforcement of its judgments in Europe currently depend primarily on the Brussels I Recast Regulation. The most recent draft of the European Commission Withdrawal Agreement, published on 19 March 2018, shows that EU and UK negotiators cannot yet agree on even the policy objectives in this area, let alone the detailed practicalities. Nine months on, this lack of progress does not sit comfortably with the plea made by Lord Thomas in July 2017 in his Mansion House speech to the judiciary for ‘urgent clarification’ and the ‘clearest commitment’ by the UK’s government on these issues. The likelihood of a transition deal and the government’s commitment to joining the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll