header-logo header-logo

Litigation futures

20 April 2018 / Julian Acratopulo
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit
printer mail-detail
nlj_7789_acratopulo

Uncertainty remains regarding the impact of Brexit on London’s legal community, as Julian Acratopulo explains

Notwithstanding that the 12 month countdown to 29 March 2019 has begun, uncertainty remains regarding the impact of Brexit on London’s legal community.

Perhaps of most immediate concern to London’s litigators is the uncertainty around jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement post-Brexit. This is because recognition of the jurisdiction of the English courts and the enforcement of its judgments in Europe currently depend primarily on the Brussels I Recast Regulation. The most recent draft of the European Commission Withdrawal Agreement, published on 19 March 2018, shows that EU and UK negotiators cannot yet agree on even the policy objectives in this area, let alone the detailed practicalities. Nine months on, this lack of progress does not sit comfortably with the plea made by Lord Thomas in July 2017 in his Mansion House speech to the judiciary for ‘urgent clarification’ and the ‘clearest commitment’ by the UK’s government on these issues. The likelihood of a transition deal and the government’s commitment to joining the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll