header-logo header-logo

Litigation: what next?

08 September 2016 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs , Technology , CPR
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan looks to the future of civil litigation

Where to begin? There are so many proposals whirling around despite the fact that the civil process underwent the single most radical overhaul but three years ago with the Jackson reforms.

Costs capers

Indeed, it was Sir Rupert Jackson who got the bandwagon rolling again with his January 2016 proposal for a universal fixed costs regime to capture all claims worth up to £250,000 in value.

It is true that the eventual extension of fixed costs was identified in his final report. The shock was the level up to which he suggested they might apply. Such was the outcry from myriad sectors of the profession that three months later, in a speech delivered at the Law Society, he recognised that reform might not be immediate nor would the proposed ceiling be accepted. For so many, £250,000 did not represent “the foothills” of multi-track; more like the giddy heights.

Make no mistake.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll