header-logo header-logo

Litigation: what next?

08 September 2016 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7713 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Profession , Costs , Technology , CPR
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan looks to the future of civil litigation

Where to begin? There are so many proposals whirling around despite the fact that the civil process underwent the single most radical overhaul but three years ago with the Jackson reforms.

Costs capers

Indeed, it was Sir Rupert Jackson who got the bandwagon rolling again with his January 2016 proposal for a universal fixed costs regime to capture all claims worth up to £250,000 in value.

It is true that the eventual extension of fixed costs was identified in his final report. The shock was the level up to which he suggested they might apply. Such was the outcry from myriad sectors of the profession that three months later, in a speech delivered at the Law Society, he recognised that reform might not be immediate nor would the proposed ceiling be accepted. For so many, £250,000 did not represent “the foothills” of multi-track; more like the giddy heights.

Make no mistake.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll