header-logo header-logo

Litigators rail against twin forces of higher court fees & increasing disclosure costs

15 June 2016
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Higher court fees and disclosure costs are threatening the Capital’s status as an international legal hub, according to the latest Litigation Trends Survey from the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) and NLJ, published this week.

The London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) members who took part in this year’s survey expressed concern that the hike in court fees now stood in the way of access to justice for smaller businesses, and was undermining the major international work which is seen as such a strong contributor to the Treasury.

More than 60% of respondents said higher court fees have already affected clients’ decisions on whether or not to commence proceedings, while 87% predicted they would affect future decision-making by clients.

They warned that businesses of all sizes are feeling the impact—the front-loading of fees proportionate to the value of the case in dispute making justice unaffordable for small businesses and troubling to big business.

More than 80% said costs budgeting has driven up litigation costs, with 82% predicting costs will continue to increase in the next five years. The rising costs of disclosure was another source of concern for respondents.

There was a 50/50 split on views about whether the courts’ approach to e-disclosure is working.

Ed Crosse, LSLA president and partner at Simmons & Simmons, said: “Front-loading of the increased court fees has delivered a heavy blow to commercial litigation, especially to smaller businesses which now feel deterred from pursuing legitimate claims.

"It’s also leading to more shopping around by larger businesses who are baulking at the increasing cost of litigating here. It would have been fairer to have sought to generate this increased income during different phases of the litigation thus better aligning fees with the status of the case.

“There are positives to come out of our survey too with summary assessment of costs by trial judges seen as welcome, subject to a proper examination of its relationship with budgeting. The recent Pyrrho Investments ruling [at [2016] EWHC 256 (Ch)] around the use of predictive coding in e-disclosure is also seen as a progressive move.”

In Pyrrho, for the first time an English court expressly endorsed the use of predictive coding software to provide disclosure. Last year, court fees rose to 5% of the value of the claim for cases worth more than £100,000, up to a maximum of £10,000.

142 LSLA members completed the online survey in spring 2016.

Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll