header-logo header-logo

Litigators rail against twin forces of higher court fees & increasing disclosure costs

15 June 2016
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Higher court fees and disclosure costs are threatening the Capital’s status as an international legal hub, according to the latest Litigation Trends Survey from the London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) and NLJ, published this week.

The London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) members who took part in this year’s survey expressed concern that the hike in court fees now stood in the way of access to justice for smaller businesses, and was undermining the major international work which is seen as such a strong contributor to the Treasury.

More than 60% of respondents said higher court fees have already affected clients’ decisions on whether or not to commence proceedings, while 87% predicted they would affect future decision-making by clients.

They warned that businesses of all sizes are feeling the impact—the front-loading of fees proportionate to the value of the case in dispute making justice unaffordable for small businesses and troubling to big business.

More than 80% said costs budgeting has driven up litigation costs, with 82% predicting costs will continue to increase in the next five years. The rising costs of disclosure was another source of concern for respondents.

There was a 50/50 split on views about whether the courts’ approach to e-disclosure is working.

Ed Crosse, LSLA president and partner at Simmons & Simmons, said: “Front-loading of the increased court fees has delivered a heavy blow to commercial litigation, especially to smaller businesses which now feel deterred from pursuing legitimate claims.

"It’s also leading to more shopping around by larger businesses who are baulking at the increasing cost of litigating here. It would have been fairer to have sought to generate this increased income during different phases of the litigation thus better aligning fees with the status of the case.

“There are positives to come out of our survey too with summary assessment of costs by trial judges seen as welcome, subject to a proper examination of its relationship with budgeting. The recent Pyrrho Investments ruling [at [2016] EWHC 256 (Ch)] around the use of predictive coding in e-disclosure is also seen as a progressive move.”

In Pyrrho, for the first time an English court expressly endorsed the use of predictive coding software to provide disclosure. Last year, court fees rose to 5% of the value of the claim for cases worth more than £100,000, up to a maximum of £10,000.

142 LSLA members completed the online survey in spring 2016.

Issue: 7703 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll