header-logo header-logo

18 June 2009 / Louisa Albertini , Nick Rose
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Living in luxury

Nick Rose & Louisa Albertini on how prestige is transmitted to trademarks

Owners of luxury brands will welcome a recent European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling which allows them to enforce selective distribution agreements and prevent their goods being sold in discount stores and other outlets which might damage the reputation and prestige of their trade marks.

The facts

The case (Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA and others (Case C-59/08)) concerned a trade mark licence agreement between Christian Dior couture SA (Dior) and Société industrielle lingerie (SIL) for the manufacture and distribution of luxury corsetry goods bearing the CHRISTIAN DIOR mark. The agreement contained a selective distribution provision aimed at maintaining the repute and prestige of the CHRISTIAN DIOR mark, which prohibited SIL from selling to wholesalers, buyers’ collectives, discount stores, mail order companies, door-to-door sales companies or companies selling within private houses without prior agreement from Dior. 

SIL subsequently faced economic difficulties and asked Dior if it could market goods outside the selective distribution network. Despite Dior refusing permission,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll