header-logo header-logo

Living in luxury

18 June 2009 / Louisa Albertini , Nick Rose
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Nick Rose & Louisa Albertini on how prestige is transmitted to trademarks

Owners of luxury brands will welcome a recent European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling which allows them to enforce selective distribution agreements and prevent their goods being sold in discount stores and other outlets which might damage the reputation and prestige of their trade marks.

The facts

The case (Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA and others (Case C-59/08)) concerned a trade mark licence agreement between Christian Dior couture SA (Dior) and Société industrielle lingerie (SIL) for the manufacture and distribution of luxury corsetry goods bearing the CHRISTIAN DIOR mark. The agreement contained a selective distribution provision aimed at maintaining the repute and prestige of the CHRISTIAN DIOR mark, which prohibited SIL from selling to wholesalers, buyers’ collectives, discount stores, mail order companies, door-to-door sales companies or companies selling within private houses without prior agreement from Dior. 

SIL subsequently faced economic difficulties and asked Dior if it could market goods outside the selective distribution network. Despite Dior refusing permission,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll