header-logo header-logo

18 June 2009 / Louisa Albertini , Nick Rose
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Living in luxury

Nick Rose & Louisa Albertini on how prestige is transmitted to trademarks

Owners of luxury brands will welcome a recent European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruling which allows them to enforce selective distribution agreements and prevent their goods being sold in discount stores and other outlets which might damage the reputation and prestige of their trade marks.

The facts

The case (Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA and others (Case C-59/08)) concerned a trade mark licence agreement between Christian Dior couture SA (Dior) and Société industrielle lingerie (SIL) for the manufacture and distribution of luxury corsetry goods bearing the CHRISTIAN DIOR mark. The agreement contained a selective distribution provision aimed at maintaining the repute and prestige of the CHRISTIAN DIOR mark, which prohibited SIL from selling to wholesalers, buyers’ collectives, discount stores, mail order companies, door-to-door sales companies or companies selling within private houses without prior agreement from Dior. 

SIL subsequently faced economic difficulties and asked Dior if it could market goods outside the selective distribution network. Despite Dior refusing permission,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll