header-logo header-logo

LLP tax change revised

26 February 2014
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

HMRC publish revised guidance

HMRC has refused calls to postpone or scrap its controversial change to the tax rules for salaried members of LLPs, but has published revised guidance.

The changes, due to apply from 6 April, mean salaried members of LLPs, or partners, will be taxed as employees. It is being introduced to stop firms using partnership as a mask for tax avoidance purposes.

Helen V McGhee, chartered tax adviser and associate at Squire Sanders, says: “There have been a number of concerns in the way the new rules are intended to operate, which perhaps have not been adequately addressed by HMRC throughout the consultation period.

“The position now is that an entirely innocuous and widely used business model is being attacked (perhaps at the risk of making UK LLPs commercially unattractive for external investors) and firms have less than two months to prepare for some fundamental changes to their tax rules based on some fairly vague guidance materials. It was hoped that the measures would be delayed until April 2015 to allow time to further consider the policy and drafting issues.”

 

Issue: 7596 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll