header-logo header-logo

14 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , Environment , Human rights , EU
printer mail-detail

LNB News: ClientEarth launches climate-based legal challenge against Belgian National Bank

ClientEarth has released a statement explaining its decision to launch a landmark legal challenge against the Belgian National Bank for not fulfilling human rights and environmental requirements when purchasing corporate assets. 

Lexis®Library update: The Bank uses the Corporate Sector Purchase Programme to make the purchases, which ClientEarth believes sends capital to some of Europe’s biggest polluting industries, with allegedly over half of the $266bn worth of assets under the programme coming from high emitting companies, including many involved in the fossil fuel industry.

The Corporate Sector Purchase Programme was devised by the European Central Bank (ECB) and ClientEarth is hoping to overturn its validity, which would involve the legal challenge going to the European Court of Justice.

ClientEarth have said: ‘We argue that the ECB’s decision establishing the programme failed to assess the climate impact of buying these corporate assets despite its legal obligations to do so. If found to be invalid, ClientEarth asks the court to order the Belgian central bank to stop purchasing bonds under the programme.’

ClientEarth has also made three recommendations to the ECB that they say would align corporate bond purchases with the goals set out in the Paris Agreement:

  • excluding companies from the purchase programme that are incompatible with the goals of the Paris Agreement
  • stopping or constraining purchases of bonds from companies with high carbon emissions if they do not implement, by January 2023 a credible strategy to achieve net zero emissions
  • publishing a comprehensive plan detailing how monetary policy portfolios and activities will be aligned with aims from the Paris Agreement

The full letter from ClientEarth is available here.

Source: Why ClientEarth is suing the central bank of Belgium for climate failings

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 13 April 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll