header-logo header-logo

LNB News: ClientEarth launches climate-based legal challenge against Belgian National Bank

14 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , Environment , Human rights , EU
printer mail-detail
ClientEarth has released a statement explaining its decision to launch a landmark legal challenge against the Belgian National Bank for not fulfilling human rights and environmental requirements when purchasing corporate assets. 

Lexis®Library update: The Bank uses the Corporate Sector Purchase Programme to make the purchases, which ClientEarth believes sends capital to some of Europe’s biggest polluting industries, with allegedly over half of the $266bn worth of assets under the programme coming from high emitting companies, including many involved in the fossil fuel industry.

The Corporate Sector Purchase Programme was devised by the European Central Bank (ECB) and ClientEarth is hoping to overturn its validity, which would involve the legal challenge going to the European Court of Justice.

ClientEarth have said: ‘We argue that the ECB’s decision establishing the programme failed to assess the climate impact of buying these corporate assets despite its legal obligations to do so. If found to be invalid, ClientEarth asks the court to order the Belgian central bank to stop purchasing bonds under the programme.’

ClientEarth has also made three recommendations to the ECB that they say would align corporate bond purchases with the goals set out in the Paris Agreement:

  • excluding companies from the purchase programme that are incompatible with the goals of the Paris Agreement
  • stopping or constraining purchases of bonds from companies with high carbon emissions if they do not implement, by January 2023 a credible strategy to achieve net zero emissions
  • publishing a comprehensive plan detailing how monetary policy portfolios and activities will be aligned with aims from the Paris Agreement

The full letter from ClientEarth is available here.

Source: Why ClientEarth is suing the central bank of Belgium for climate failings

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 13 April 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Firm launches business immigration practice with dual partner hire

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Scottish offering strengthened with dispute resolution partner hire in Glasgow

NEWS
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll