header-logo header-logo

14 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , Environment , Human rights , EU
printer mail-detail

LNB News: ClientEarth launches climate-based legal challenge against Belgian National Bank

ClientEarth has released a statement explaining its decision to launch a landmark legal challenge against the Belgian National Bank for not fulfilling human rights and environmental requirements when purchasing corporate assets. 

Lexis®Library update: The Bank uses the Corporate Sector Purchase Programme to make the purchases, which ClientEarth believes sends capital to some of Europe’s biggest polluting industries, with allegedly over half of the $266bn worth of assets under the programme coming from high emitting companies, including many involved in the fossil fuel industry.

The Corporate Sector Purchase Programme was devised by the European Central Bank (ECB) and ClientEarth is hoping to overturn its validity, which would involve the legal challenge going to the European Court of Justice.

ClientEarth have said: ‘We argue that the ECB’s decision establishing the programme failed to assess the climate impact of buying these corporate assets despite its legal obligations to do so. If found to be invalid, ClientEarth asks the court to order the Belgian central bank to stop purchasing bonds under the programme.’

ClientEarth has also made three recommendations to the ECB that they say would align corporate bond purchases with the goals set out in the Paris Agreement:

  • excluding companies from the purchase programme that are incompatible with the goals of the Paris Agreement
  • stopping or constraining purchases of bonds from companies with high carbon emissions if they do not implement, by January 2023 a credible strategy to achieve net zero emissions
  • publishing a comprehensive plan detailing how monetary policy portfolios and activities will be aligned with aims from the Paris Agreement

The full letter from ClientEarth is available here.

Source: Why ClientEarth is suing the central bank of Belgium for climate failings

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 13 April 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll