header-logo header-logo

19 January 2023
Categories: Legal News , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: Commons debates further amendments to Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

MPs debated further amendments to the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill on 18 January 2023 as it returned to the House of Commons for its remaining Commons stages.

Lexis®Library update: Among the amendments under consideration were a number of technical amendments proposed by the government, an opposition amendment with cross-party support requiring the Secretary of State to produce an exhaustive list of all legislation to be revoked under the sunset provision at least three months before the sunset deadline specified in the Bill, and to allow that list to be amended by Parliament, plus a number of amendments relating to protection of workers’ rights and environmental protections. Extension of the sunset deadline to 2026, as well as provisions excluding legislation within devolved competence from the sunset, were also among the amendments debated. At the time of publication the debate was ongoing. Further details to follow.

John Bell, LLM, former Schuman Trainee at the European Parliament, has commented on the debate.

To view the tabled amendments, see: Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill, As Amended (Amendment Paper) and Speaker’s provisional grouping and selection of Amendments.

To view the Commons transcript, see: Hansard, House of Commons, 18 January 2023.

John Bell has commented:

'As it concludes its remaining stages in the Commons, the REULRR Bill continues to raise issues of legal certainty. The sunset clause would create a cliff edge bonfire of thousands of items of Retained EU Law at the end of 2023 with no provision for consultation.

As confirmed by the front bench, the number of REUL on the Cabinet Office Dashboard is unknown, placing practitioners and stakeholders in unchartered waters. This is a concern since thousands of items of REUL potentially captured by the sunset clause cover EU-derived environmental, food safety, product safety, and employment rights.

The REULRR Bill contains extensive use of Henry VIII powers, taking back control to Government rather than Parliament 6 years on from the Brexit referendum. Faced with this democratic deficit, it will likely fall on the unelected House of Lords to bring a modicum of legal certainty to this deeply flawed Bill.’

For further updates via Bill Tracker, see: LNB News 23/09/2022 11.

Sources:

• Hansard, House of Commons, 18 January 2023

• Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill - Parliamentary Bills - UK Parliament

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 18 January 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll