header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: Commons Library publishes guidance on complaints about courts, judges, legal professionals and judicial office-holders

The House of Commons Library has published guidance on 5 March 2023 on how constituents can contact their MPs to complain about personal conduct of judicial office holders and about courts, judges and legal professionals.

Lexis®Library update: 

Complaints about judicial office holders:

The Commons Library has highlighted that it is about their behaviour towards other people (litigants, lawyers, court staff, colleagues etc) and where there is a breach of professional obligations, giving examples such as bullying, racism, aggression and misuse of social media among many others. 

England and Wales:

• Complaints about magistrates (lay justices) should be directed to the Local Advisory Committee

• Complaints about tribunal judges (except Chamber Presidents) should be directed to the relevant Chamber President.  

Scotland:

• Complaints about judges should be directed to the Judicial Office for Scotland

• Complaints about reserved tribunal members (whether legal or non-legal members) are to be made to the relevant tribunal president.  

Northern Ireland:

• Complaints about Northern Ireland's courts and tribunal judges should be directed to the Complaints Officer of the Judiciary of Northern Ireland  

Complaints about courts, judges and legal professionals:

The Commons Library has explained that constituents should seek independent legal advice from an appropriate practitioner with professional indemnity insurance if challenging a judge on a point of law.  

Judges:

• Complaints about judicial misconduct should be made to the Judicial Complaints Investigations Office (JCIO)

• This excludes complaints about judges in Scotland’s or Northern Ireland’s courts, UK Supreme Court, Magistrates (lay judges) and tribunal members (except for Chamber Presidents) 

Courts and tribunals:

• Complaints should be raised with HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) or if relevant, its Scottish or Northern Ireland equivalent 

Other Legal Professionals:

• Complaints about a lawyer who is not a judge should be made as relevant to the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority, the Bar Standards Board, the Legal Ombudsman or the CILEx Regulation in England

• Complaints should be made to the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission in Scotland

• Complaints should be made to the Law Society of Northern Ireland for solicitors and the Professional Conduct Committee of the Bar of Northern Ireland for barristers.

Sources:

• Complaining about personal conduct of judicial office-holders

• Complaining about courts, judges and legal professionals

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 7 March 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Flint Bishop—Charlotte Harris

Sheffield expansion continues with appointment of commercial property partner

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson—Paul Duggan

Browne Jacobson strengthens banking and finance practice with latest partner appointment Paul Duggan

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Ward Hadaway—Chris Piggott

Employment partner joins Ward Hadaway

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll