header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: Commons Library publishes guidance on complaints about courts, judges, legal professionals and judicial office-holders

The House of Commons Library has published guidance on 5 March 2023 on how constituents can contact their MPs to complain about personal conduct of judicial office holders and about courts, judges and legal professionals.

Lexis®Library update: 

Complaints about judicial office holders:

The Commons Library has highlighted that it is about their behaviour towards other people (litigants, lawyers, court staff, colleagues etc) and where there is a breach of professional obligations, giving examples such as bullying, racism, aggression and misuse of social media among many others. 

England and Wales:

• Complaints about magistrates (lay justices) should be directed to the Local Advisory Committee

• Complaints about tribunal judges (except Chamber Presidents) should be directed to the relevant Chamber President.  

Scotland:

• Complaints about judges should be directed to the Judicial Office for Scotland

• Complaints about reserved tribunal members (whether legal or non-legal members) are to be made to the relevant tribunal president.  

Northern Ireland:

• Complaints about Northern Ireland's courts and tribunal judges should be directed to the Complaints Officer of the Judiciary of Northern Ireland  

Complaints about courts, judges and legal professionals:

The Commons Library has explained that constituents should seek independent legal advice from an appropriate practitioner with professional indemnity insurance if challenging a judge on a point of law.  

Judges:

• Complaints about judicial misconduct should be made to the Judicial Complaints Investigations Office (JCIO)

• This excludes complaints about judges in Scotland’s or Northern Ireland’s courts, UK Supreme Court, Magistrates (lay judges) and tribunal members (except for Chamber Presidents) 

Courts and tribunals:

• Complaints should be raised with HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) or if relevant, its Scottish or Northern Ireland equivalent 

Other Legal Professionals:

• Complaints about a lawyer who is not a judge should be made as relevant to the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority, the Bar Standards Board, the Legal Ombudsman or the CILEx Regulation in England

• Complaints should be made to the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission in Scotland

• Complaints should be made to the Law Society of Northern Ireland for solicitors and the Professional Conduct Committee of the Bar of Northern Ireland for barristers.

Sources:

• Complaining about personal conduct of judicial office-holders

• Complaining about courts, judges and legal professionals

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 7 March 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll