header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: Commons Library publishes guidance on complaints about courts, judges, legal professionals and judicial office-holders

The House of Commons Library has published guidance on 5 March 2023 on how constituents can contact their MPs to complain about personal conduct of judicial office holders and about courts, judges and legal professionals.

Lexis®Library update: 

Complaints about judicial office holders:

The Commons Library has highlighted that it is about their behaviour towards other people (litigants, lawyers, court staff, colleagues etc) and where there is a breach of professional obligations, giving examples such as bullying, racism, aggression and misuse of social media among many others. 

England and Wales:

• Complaints about magistrates (lay justices) should be directed to the Local Advisory Committee

• Complaints about tribunal judges (except Chamber Presidents) should be directed to the relevant Chamber President.  

Scotland:

• Complaints about judges should be directed to the Judicial Office for Scotland

• Complaints about reserved tribunal members (whether legal or non-legal members) are to be made to the relevant tribunal president.  

Northern Ireland:

• Complaints about Northern Ireland's courts and tribunal judges should be directed to the Complaints Officer of the Judiciary of Northern Ireland  

Complaints about courts, judges and legal professionals:

The Commons Library has explained that constituents should seek independent legal advice from an appropriate practitioner with professional indemnity insurance if challenging a judge on a point of law.  

Judges:

• Complaints about judicial misconduct should be made to the Judicial Complaints Investigations Office (JCIO)

• This excludes complaints about judges in Scotland’s or Northern Ireland’s courts, UK Supreme Court, Magistrates (lay judges) and tribunal members (except for Chamber Presidents) 

Courts and tribunals:

• Complaints should be raised with HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) or if relevant, its Scottish or Northern Ireland equivalent 

Other Legal Professionals:

• Complaints about a lawyer who is not a judge should be made as relevant to the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority, the Bar Standards Board, the Legal Ombudsman or the CILEx Regulation in England

• Complaints should be made to the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission in Scotland

• Complaints should be made to the Law Society of Northern Ireland for solicitors and the Professional Conduct Committee of the Bar of Northern Ireland for barristers.

Sources:

• Complaining about personal conduct of judicial office-holders

• Complaining about courts, judges and legal professionals

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 7 March 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll