header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: Commons Library publishes guidance on complaints about courts, judges, legal professionals and judicial office-holders

The House of Commons Library has published guidance on 5 March 2023 on how constituents can contact their MPs to complain about personal conduct of judicial office holders and about courts, judges and legal professionals.

Lexis®Library update: 

Complaints about judicial office holders:

The Commons Library has highlighted that it is about their behaviour towards other people (litigants, lawyers, court staff, colleagues etc) and where there is a breach of professional obligations, giving examples such as bullying, racism, aggression and misuse of social media among many others. 

England and Wales:

• Complaints about magistrates (lay justices) should be directed to the Local Advisory Committee

• Complaints about tribunal judges (except Chamber Presidents) should be directed to the relevant Chamber President.  

Scotland:

• Complaints about judges should be directed to the Judicial Office for Scotland

• Complaints about reserved tribunal members (whether legal or non-legal members) are to be made to the relevant tribunal president.  

Northern Ireland:

• Complaints about Northern Ireland's courts and tribunal judges should be directed to the Complaints Officer of the Judiciary of Northern Ireland  

Complaints about courts, judges and legal professionals:

The Commons Library has explained that constituents should seek independent legal advice from an appropriate practitioner with professional indemnity insurance if challenging a judge on a point of law.  

Judges:

• Complaints about judicial misconduct should be made to the Judicial Complaints Investigations Office (JCIO)

• This excludes complaints about judges in Scotland’s or Northern Ireland’s courts, UK Supreme Court, Magistrates (lay judges) and tribunal members (except for Chamber Presidents) 

Courts and tribunals:

• Complaints should be raised with HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) or if relevant, its Scottish or Northern Ireland equivalent 

Other Legal Professionals:

• Complaints about a lawyer who is not a judge should be made as relevant to the Solicitors’ Regulation Authority, the Bar Standards Board, the Legal Ombudsman or the CILEx Regulation in England

• Complaints should be made to the Scottish Legal Complaints Commission in Scotland

• Complaints should be made to the Law Society of Northern Ireland for solicitors and the Professional Conduct Committee of the Bar of Northern Ireland for barristers.

Sources:

• Complaining about personal conduct of judicial office-holders

• Complaining about courts, judges and legal professionals

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 7 March 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maria Karaiskos KC, Church Court Chambers

Maria Karaiskos KC, recently appointed as the first female head of Church Court Chambers, discusses breaking down barriers, the lure of the courtroom, and the power of storytelling

Bevan Brittan—Bethan Gladwyn

Bevan Brittan—Bethan Gladwyn

Housing management team expands with specialist partner hire

Ionic Legal—Tania D’Souza Culora

Ionic Legal—Tania D’Souza Culora

Brand protection and IP disputes expertise strengthened with partner hire

NEWS
In a special tribute in this week's NLJ, David Burrows reflects on the retirement of Patrick Allen, co-founder of Hodge Jones & Allen, whose career epitomised the heyday of legal aid
Writing in NLJ this week, Kelvin Rutledge KC of Cornerstone Barristers and Genevieve Screeche-Powell of Field Court Chambers examine the Court of Appeal’s rejection of a discrimination challenge to Tower Hamlets’ housing database
Michael Zander KC, Emeritus Professor at LSE, tracks the turbulent passage of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill through the House of Lords in this week's issue of NLJ. Two marathon debates drew contributions from nearly 200 peers, split between support, opposition and conditional approval
Alistair Mills of Landmark Chambers reflects on the Human Rights Act 1998 a quarter-century after it came into force, in this week's issue of NLJ
In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ, Stephen Gold surveys a raft of procedural changes and quirky disputes shaping civil practice. His message is clear: civil practitioners must brace for continual tweaks, unexpected contentions and rising costs in everyday litigation
back-to-top-scroll