header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary publishes guidance on modes of address in courts and tribunals

05 December 2022
Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Lord Burnett of Maldon, and the Senior President of Tribunals, Sir Keith Lindblom, have issued a joint press release announcing a change in the practice of how certain judges should be addressed in court or tribunal hearings. 

Lexis®Library update: Masters, Upper Tribunal judges, judges of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, district judges, district judges (Magistrates Courts), First-Tier Tribunal judges, and Employment judges should no longer be addressed as ‘Sir’ or ‘Madam’, but only as ‘Judge’. This change of terminology has been described as ‘modern’ and ‘simple’ while maintaining the required degree of respect of the judicial role.

Non-legal members should continue to be addressed in court or tribunals as ‘Sir’ or ‘Madam’.

The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary’s webpage ‘What do I call a judge?’ has been updated to reflect the latest changes. The page can be consulted here.

Source: Message from the Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals – Modes of address in courts and tribunals

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 2 December 2022 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Private wealth and tax offering bolstered by partner hire

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll