header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary publishes guidance on modes of address in courts and tribunals

05 December 2022
Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Lord Burnett of Maldon, and the Senior President of Tribunals, Sir Keith Lindblom, have issued a joint press release announcing a change in the practice of how certain judges should be addressed in court or tribunal hearings. 

Lexis®Library update: Masters, Upper Tribunal judges, judges of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, district judges, district judges (Magistrates Courts), First-Tier Tribunal judges, and Employment judges should no longer be addressed as ‘Sir’ or ‘Madam’, but only as ‘Judge’. This change of terminology has been described as ‘modern’ and ‘simple’ while maintaining the required degree of respect of the judicial role.

Non-legal members should continue to be addressed in court or tribunals as ‘Sir’ or ‘Madam’.

The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary’s webpage ‘What do I call a judge?’ has been updated to reflect the latest changes. The page can be consulted here.

Source: Message from the Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals – Modes of address in courts and tribunals

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 2 December 2022 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

BCL Solicitors—Robert Lawrie

Commercial disputes team lead promoted to partner

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Mourant—Tom Fothergill

Jersey finance and corporate practice welcomes new partner

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Shakespeare Martineau—Solicitor apprentices

Firm launches solicitor apprenticeship programme with inaugural cohort

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll