header-logo header-logo

LNB News: Home Office launches consultation on Computer Misuse Act 1990

13 May 2021
Categories: Legal News , Technology , Cyber
printer mail-detail
The Home Office is seeking views on the Computer Misuse Act 1990 (CMA 1990), including offences and the powers available to law enforcement agencies to investigate those offences. 

Lexis®Library update: According to the Home Office, since CMA 1990 was passed 30 years ago, there has been an increased 'reliance on the digital world' and 'we are now critically dependent on the internet'. The Home Office's consultation seeks to identify whether there is activity causing harm in the area covered by CMA 1990 that is not adequately addressed by the current offences. The Home Office is keen to hear from UK organisations, in particular, academia, business, law enforcement agencies, the cybersecurity industry and private sector. The consultation closes at 11.45pm on 8 June 2021.

The Computer Misuse Act 1990—call for information can be downloaded here.

Responses to the consultation can be submitted via email to: cmareview@homeoffice.gov.uk or by post to: The CMA Review, Home Office, 2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DF.

Source: Computer Misuse Act 1990: call for information

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 12 May 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

Categories: Legal News , Technology , Cyber
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll