header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: Law Society concerned about effectiveness of SRA's additional powers

17 October 2022
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
The Law Society has reported that it has some concerns as to how effective the Solicitors Regulation Authority's (SRA) additional powers, which came about as a result of the government's proposal to remove the statutory cap on financial penalties the SRA can impose under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, will be in tackling economic crime. 

Lexis®Library update: The Law Society President, Lubna Shuja, said: 'The SRA’s fining powers have been substantially increased in relation to traditional firms and individuals from £2,000 to £25,000. There appears to have been little evidence that a parallel increase in the Financial Conduct Authority fining powersor the large fines they have applied have aided the fight against financial crime.

'Therefore, we do not have confidence that increased fining powers for the SRA would have a significant enough impact on the fight against economic crime to warrant the additional burden of regulation. We are concerned about the impact of the proposed additional powers on our members and we urge the government to carefully consider the proportionality of additional regulation.'

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 14 October 2022 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll