header-logo header-logo

01 April 2026
Issue: 8156 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Child law , Legal aid focus , Litigants in person
printer mail-detail

Call for return of family legal aid as cases rise

Rising numbers of cases, an increase in litigants in person and an overall lack of investment is piling pressure on the family court, the Law Society has warned

There was a 3% increase in family cases in the fourth quarter of 2025, compared to the previous year—with private family law up 13%, financial remedies up 13% and domestic abuse cases up 4%, according to the Family Court Statistics Quarterly: October to December 2025.

Throughout 2025, both parties appeared without a lawyer in almost half (47%) of private family cases, which often involve a dispute over child arrangements.

Law Society president Mark Evans urged the government to bring back family legal aid—removed from most family matters 13 years ago by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012).

Evans said: ‘These figures tell a clear story. Too many people are left to navigate complex and emotional court processes alone. Investing now would ease the immediate pressure on the civil justice system.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll