header-logo header-logo

01 April 2026
Issue: 8156 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Divorce , Child law , Legal aid focus , Litigants in person
printer mail-detail

Call for return of family legal aid as cases rise

Rising numbers of cases, an increase in litigants in person and an overall lack of investment is piling pressure on the family court, the Law Society has warned

There was a 3% increase in family cases in the fourth quarter of 2025, compared to the previous year—with private family law up 13%, financial remedies up 13% and domestic abuse cases up 4%, according to the Family Court Statistics Quarterly: October to December 2025.

Throughout 2025, both parties appeared without a lawyer in almost half (47%) of private family cases, which often involve a dispute over child arrangements.

Law Society president Mark Evans urged the government to bring back family legal aid—removed from most family matters 13 years ago by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012).

Evans said: ‘These figures tell a clear story. Too many people are left to navigate complex and emotional court processes alone. Investing now would ease the immediate pressure on the civil justice system.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll