header-logo header-logo

14 February 2023
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pensions
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: MoJ issues February 2023 statement on fee-paid judicial litigation

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has issued a statement which provides an update on the work being done by the MoJ to provide pension benefits to eligible judges for fee-paid services. 

Lexis®Library update: This work is in response to the Court of Justice of the European Union’s judgment in Dermod Patrick O'Brien v Ministry of Justice, Case C‑432/17 and the Supreme Court’s judgment in Miller and others v Ministry of Justice [2019] UKSC 60. The statement includes a progress report on interim payments and a note that the settlements will be reconciled with entitlements under the Judicial Pensions (Fee Paid Judges) (Amendment) Regulations 2023, expected to come into force on 1 April 2023.

The next update will be provided by 14 April 2023.

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Pensions
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll