header-logo header-logo

LNB news: MoJ publishes extending fixed recoverable costs consultation response

07 September 2021
Categories: Legal News , Costs , Profession
printer mail-detail
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published the government’s response to the extending fixed recoverable costs (FRC) in civil cases consultation
Lexis®Library update: It is the government’s intention to extend FRC to all fast-track cases (up to £25,000 in damages) in the county court. This will be proportionate to the sum in issue and provide certainty as to the maximum amount of damages payable by an unsuccessful party. All cases will be allocated as soon as practicable to one of the four bands of complexity.

The government states it will also carry out the new process and separate grid of FRC for noise induced hearing loss, extend the fast track to incorporate cases with damages valued between £25,000-£100,000 ('intermediate' cases), and intends to introduce costs budgeting to all 'heavy' judicial reviews. The next step in implementing the FRC will be for the government to submit draft rules for consideration.

Responses to the consultation include:

• 42% were in favour of the general fast track proposals, this includes the majority of those representing defendants and law firms who believe the proposals would be an appropriate way to control litigation costs

• 52% against the proposals representing claimants argued that it should not be a ‘one size fits all’ model

• issues raised include inflation, counsel and specialist lawyer fees, complexity of cases and fraud cases

Source: Fixed recoverable costs consultation

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 6 September 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

Categories: Legal News , Costs , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll