header-logo header-logo

LNB News: Mrs Justice Cockerill speech on commercial dispute resolution post-Brexit and coronavirus (COVID-19)

17 June 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Brexit , Covid-19 , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Mrs Justice Cockerill has given a speech at the Dispute Resolution Forum 2021 highlighting the challenges faced by the judiciary and the court system following coronavirus (COVID-19) and Brexit. 

Lexis®Library update: Cockerill J explained the many problems that have developed as a result of remote hearings, and what needs to change to preserve the English courts as the jurisdiction of choice for dispute resolution in a post-Brexit paradigm.

Cockerill J stated in her speech that cross examination during remote hearings differs from in-person questioning in two ways. First, the quality and depth of the interaction suffers as a result of the loss of body language between counsel and witness. The second, is that in her view, witnesses tend to be more disinhibited when engaged in a remote cross examination. She reminded that the purpose of cross examination is not to make the witness feel more relaxed, but to get to the truth of a matter. Cockerill J elaborated her fear that being at home or within a safe territory, shielded from the critical eye of the judge and counsel can make it easier for a witness to lie, or not tell the whole truth.

Cockerill J pointed to another aspect of disinhibition caused by remote hearings by providing the example of the BBC case R (Finch) v Surrey County Council (Contempt) [2021] EWHC 170 (QB), where the BBC broadcasted ongoing remote hearings as it was possible to access them online.

As a second heading of her speech, in relation to coronavirus, Cockerill J shared her concern that fundamental aspects of learning are lost without in person interaction. In her view, pupils, trainee solicitors, clerks and staff, have lost learning opportunities without personal interaction and presence in court.

Cockerill J then reminded that complacency must be resisted if the English courts are to remain the favoured venue for dispute resolution.

She recommended that improvements be made to the procedural effectiveness of the courts and that the law be developed in a way that is responsive to modern financial transactions.

Finally, Cockerill J highlighted the Law Commission’s work to review the Arbitration Act 1996 and stressed the importance of not missing this opportunity to develop arbitration.

The full speech can be read here.

Source: Speech by Mrs Justice Cockerill: Learning our ABC’s: Thoughts about Commercial Dispute Resolution After Brexit and COVID

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 16 June 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
David Lammy, Ellie Reeves and Baroness Levitt have taken up office at the Ministry of Justice, following the cabinet reshuffle
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll