header-logo header-logo

26 October 2021
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber , Cybercrime
printer mail-detail

LNB news: SRA announces new affirmative cyber clause for solicitors

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has announced that a new clause will be added to the minimum terms and conditions (MTCs) for law firms’ professional indemnity insurance policies to address affirmative cyber cover

Lexis®Library update: The clause has been drafted with legal professionals and insurers, and it has been submitted to the Legal Services Board for final approval. If agreed, it should be in place for any insurance renewals from early 2022 onwards.

The clause means insurance policies will explicitly state whether cover for cybercrime is available and specify what losses fall within scope for a potential claim. The cover is for client and third-party protection. Losses to the law firm, ie first-party losses (except for certain costs of investigating and defending a claim) are not covered. Firms can choose to purchase a separate cyber policy for other risks.

The SRA has also published a summary of responses to the consultation regarding the addition of the new clause. Some respondents, including law firms, agreed that the SRA should be making changes to the MTCs. Insurers argued that the clause should reduce the level of cyber cover that is currently within the MTCs. While some said that the current MTCs give limited scope to manage cyber exposure and this will impact on insurers’ risk appetites and pricing, others argued that any losses caused by a cyber event should be subject to separate cyber insurance policies. One insurer said that while the clauses provided ‘clarity’ on what is covered, they did not provide ‘comfort’. These comments contrast with the Law Society, who suggested that the level of cover should be extended to cover first-party losses.

The SRA Chief Executive, Paul Philip, said ‘professional indemnity insurance offers key protection for the public. Law firms handle large amounts of client money and sensitive information, and that makes them an attractive target to cybercriminals. The clause on cyber losses provides real clarity for consumers, law firms and insurers about client and third-party protection in the event of cyber-attack, without changing the amount of cover specified by the minimum terms and conditions.’

Sources:

Cybercrime clause makes liability clear

Professional indemnity insurance: affirmative cyber cover

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 25 October 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll