header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2023—amendments to qualified one-way costs shifting

06 February 2023
Categories: Legal News , CPR , Costs , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2023, SI 2023/105, made on 30 January 2023, were published on 2 February 2023. 

Lexis®Library update: The amendments made to qualified one-way costs shifting apply only to claims where proceedings are issued on or after 6th April 2023.

SI 2023/105 includes amendments made at Part 44 in relation to rule 44.14 which covers the effect of qualified on-way costs shifting.

The amendments made, will:

• allow courts in England and Wales to order that the parties' costs in cases falling within the scope of the qualified one-way costs regime be set-off against each other

• include deemed orders and agreements to pay damages or costs to allow off-setting of costs orders made in favour a defendant

• ensure offers made under Part 36 (regarding offers to settle) come within rule 44.14

Source: The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2023

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 3 February 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll