header-logo header-logo

07 July 2017
Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Local authority

R (on the application of JF acting through his mother and litigation friend) v Merton London Borough Council [2017] EWHC 1519 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 01 (Jul)

The Administrative Court quashed the defendant local authority’s decision to change the residential provision for the claimant who had autism spectrum disorder and severe learning difficulties. The authority’s assessment of his needs had breached statutory duties under the Care Act 2014, and no reasonable local authority would terminate the placement of someone with his complex needs without having conducted a lawful assessment and decided that suitable alternative accommodation had been available.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
back-to-top-scroll