header-logo header-logo

Locating missing respondents

07 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Government departments are becoming increasingly more unco-operative...

Government departments are becoming increasingly more unco-operative about assisting in the disclosure of addresses of “missing” respondents so as to facilitate service of matrimonial proceedings, even where financial and/or child care issues have to be determined. Letters to the Department for Work and Pensions seem to end up with HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) which says it will disclose nothing without a High Court order. What can be done about procuring help and from whom?

The arrangements for disclosure of addresses by government departments were agreed and set out in the Practice Direction (Disclosure of Addresses) [1989] 1 All ER 765, as amended (PD). However, most departments will not disclose information without a court order. The court may make an order for disclosure in cases falling within the terms of the PD or, in the case of a missing child, under the Family Law Act 1986, s 33, but not all departments will accept such an order as sufficient authority to disclose confidential information. In the case of HM

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
back-to-top-scroll