header-logo header-logo

05 August 2022
Issue: 7990 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

London legal salaries rocket

A booming jobs market has sent City salaries soaring, recruiters report

Recruitment firm JMC Legal and market data analysts Vacancysoft reported last week that 40% of UK lawyer vacancies are in London, with in-house the fastest growing source of vacancies (58% of vacancies in London in 2022, with tech companies accounting for 29% of these).

Salaries have also jumped, as City firms compete for talent amid a shortage of qualified lawyers. US law firms are now offering 50% above Magic Circle firms in some cases, partly because sterling is low in comparison to the US dollar. In July, for example, Akin Gump raised its salary for newly qualified lawyers to a stonking £179,000. London-headquartered firms have also boosted pay, for example, McFarlanes is reported to have raised its newly qualified salaries this month to £107,500, having pushed them 11% to £100,000 last November. At the other end of the scale, profit per equity partner topped £2m at Magic Circle firms Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Clifford Chance for the first time this year.

Recruiter Robert Walters found 85% of law firms in London are recruiting, with more jobs posted in the first half of 2022 than in the whole of 2020. Moreover, nearly all firms (93%) have no plans to cut headcount.

Tax specialists are the most sought-after lawyers, followed by real estate and M&A.

Richard Harris, chief legal officer at Robert Walters Group, said: ‘What we encounter during a downturn is a cut back in new trainees, but when demand increases this means there are simply less available qualified lawyers at the junior end of the profession, putting pressure on the system as a whole.

‘Add in truly incredible wage inflation, greater specialism making some types of lawyer scarce, the increasing scale of in-house teams―partly in response to the increasing rates of law firms which funds the wage inflation―and we have a ticking timebomb of pressure.’
Issue: 7990 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll