header-logo header-logo

The long haul

26 October 2012 / Colm Nugent
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

What liability does an employer carry for accidents resulting from excessive working hours, asks Colm Nugent

British workers put in some of the longest hours in Europe, despite the Working Time Directive. So what if a worker injures himself or others in a tiredness-related traffic accident?

Could he or other victims sue the employer or contractor? Might the Road Traffic Act insurers seek to pass off some or all of the damage onto the employer’s/contractor’s insurers? In this article “workers” include employees and self-employed; “employers” include contractors.

For a viable claim, the employer’s duty of care must extend beyond the workplace into the worker’s time away from work. But would the claim meet the tests of proximity in Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605—that it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty, and reasonable foresight of harm?

The extent and standard of duty must be defined and the standard of the employer’s care must be reasonable in all the circumstances. Negligence has been defined (in an employment context) as “the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll