header-logo header-logo

The long haul

26 October 2012 / Colm Nugent
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

What liability does an employer carry for accidents resulting from excessive working hours, asks Colm Nugent

British workers put in some of the longest hours in Europe, despite the Working Time Directive. So what if a worker injures himself or others in a tiredness-related traffic accident?

Could he or other victims sue the employer or contractor? Might the Road Traffic Act insurers seek to pass off some or all of the damage onto the employer’s/contractor’s insurers? In this article “workers” include employees and self-employed; “employers” include contractors.

For a viable claim, the employer’s duty of care must extend beyond the workplace into the worker’s time away from work. But would the claim meet the tests of proximity in Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605—that it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty, and reasonable foresight of harm?

The extent and standard of duty must be defined and the standard of the employer’s care must be reasonable in all the circumstances. Negligence has been defined (in an employment context) as “the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll