header-logo header-logo

The long haul

26 October 2012 / Colm Nugent
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

What liability does an employer carry for accidents resulting from excessive working hours, asks Colm Nugent

British workers put in some of the longest hours in Europe, despite the Working Time Directive. So what if a worker injures himself or others in a tiredness-related traffic accident?

Could he or other victims sue the employer or contractor? Might the Road Traffic Act insurers seek to pass off some or all of the damage onto the employer’s/contractor’s insurers? In this article “workers” include employees and self-employed; “employers” include contractors.

For a viable claim, the employer’s duty of care must extend beyond the workplace into the worker’s time away from work. But would the claim meet the tests of proximity in Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605—that it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty, and reasonable foresight of harm?

The extent and standard of duty must be defined and the standard of the employer’s care must be reasonable in all the circumstances. Negligence has been defined (in an employment context) as “the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll