header-logo header-logo

26 October 2012 / Colm Nugent
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

The long haul

What liability does an employer carry for accidents resulting from excessive working hours, asks Colm Nugent

British workers put in some of the longest hours in Europe, despite the Working Time Directive. So what if a worker injures himself or others in a tiredness-related traffic accident?

Could he or other victims sue the employer or contractor? Might the Road Traffic Act insurers seek to pass off some or all of the damage onto the employer’s/contractor’s insurers? In this article “workers” include employees and self-employed; “employers” include contractors.

For a viable claim, the employer’s duty of care must extend beyond the workplace into the worker’s time away from work. But would the claim meet the tests of proximity in Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605—that it is fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty, and reasonable foresight of harm?

The extent and standard of duty must be defined and the standard of the employer’s care must be reasonable in all the circumstances. Negligence has been defined (in an employment context) as “the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll