header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Colm Nugent

Colm Nugent is a barrister in the insurance division at Hardwicke Chambers (colm.nugent@hardwicke.co.ukwww.hardwicke.co.uk)

 

    Colm Nugent is a barrister in the insurance division at Hardwicke Chambers (colm.nugent@hardwicke.co.ukwww.hardwicke.co.uk)

     
      ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

      Colm Nugent considers when an unsafe structure does not trigger the landlord’s duty to repair

      Courts are taking an increasingly tougher approach in fraudulent & exaggerated claims, says Colm Nugent

      What liability does an employer carry for accidents resulting from excessive working hours, asks Colm Nugent

      Show
      8
      Results
      Results
      8
      Results

      MOVERS & SHAKERS

      Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

      Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

      Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

      HFW—Simon Petch

      HFW—Simon Petch

      Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

      Freeths—Richard Lockhart

      Freeths—Richard Lockhart

      Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

      NEWS
      Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
      The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
      A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
      After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
      Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
      back-to-top-scroll