header-logo header-logo

Long past its sell-by date?

21 October 2010 / Laura Shirley
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Laura Shirley reports on how the SRA intends to overhaul the CPD treadmill

For many busy solicitors, CPD can too often be seen as little more than a tick box exercise—something that has to be done to remain eligible to practise. But such an approach fails to realise the potential of CPD to maintain and enhance the competence, performance and ethical conduct of solicitors, and to assist solicitors in progressing their careers.

The current compulsory scheme was introduced in 1985 and only minor amendments have been made since its introduction. The main benefit of the scheme has always been its flexibility:

  • Only 25% of the requirement must be met through participation in accredited courses.
  • The remainder may be met through a wide range of other activities including writing articles, participating in informal mentoring sessions, research relating to legal topics, and watching DVDs or webcasts.

Other than the mandatory management course that solicitors attend within the first three years following admission, and specific requirements for higher court advocates, we do not specify

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

NLJ Career Profile: Ben Daniels, DAC Beachcroft

Ben Daniels, newly elected as the next senior partner of DAC Beachcroft, reflects on his leadership inspiration and considers an impish alternative career

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Osbornes Law—Lee Henderson

Family team bolstered by latest partner hire

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Freeths—Graeme Danby & John Jeffreys

Firms strengthens national restructuring and insolvency practice with leadership appointments

NEWS
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
In NLJ this week, Ian Smith, emeritus professor at UEA, explores major developments in employment law from the Supreme Court and appellate courts
Writing in NLJ this week, Kamran Rehman and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Operafund Eco-Invest SICAV plc v Spain, where the Commercial Court held that ICSID and Energy Charter Treaty awards cannot be assigned
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School highlights a turbulent end to 2025 in the civil courts, from the looming appeal in Mazur to judicial frustration with ever-expanding bundles, in his final NLJ 'The insider' column of the year
back-to-top-scroll