header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010 / John Summers
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

The long & winding road

Once a highway, always a highway? asks John Summers

In R (Smith) v The Land Registry [2010] EWCA Civ 200 Mr Smith occupied a caravan and other land on a byway in Cambridgeshire for over 12 years. The evidence was that he did not obstruct the byway and kept his land tidy. He applied to the Land Registry for first registration of the land by reason of his adverse possession of it. The local council objected to the application on the basis that the land was shown on the relevant definitive map as a public highway open to all traffic. The Land Registry refused the application because the land in question was a public highway. Mr Smith brought judicial review proceedings to challenge the Land Registry’s decision. His claim was dismissed at first instance and he appealed.

Judgments

All three members of the Court of Appeal gave reasoned judgments. Arden LJ noted that while there was a long standing saying in English law to the effect, “Once a highway, always a highway”,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll