header-logo header-logo

Look both ways

02 September 2010 / Tom Pangbourne , Julian Miller
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Tax , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Julian Miller & Tom Pangbourne assess the dangers of tax avoidance schemes

Claims against professional advisers in relation to their role in tax avoidance schemes are on the increase. This article examines the basis of such schemes, and why solicitors, barristers and other professionals involved in their implementation may be at risk.

Capital allowances tax reliefs

A number of capital allowance tax reliefs were introduced by the Labour government after 1997 which were designed to encourage investment in particular areas of British industry. This included investment in British films (under s 48 of the Finance (No 2) Act 1998), in technology start-ups (under
s 45 of the Capital Allowances Act 2001) and in research and development (under s 437 Capital Allowances Act 2001). Despite best intentions, inevitably this attracted not just those wishing to invest in the relevant sector but also high net worth individuals seeking to utilise the tax reliefs without any real interest in the underlying asset. This artificiality led to increased scrutiny by HMRC, the gradual restriction of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll