header-logo header-logo

Look both ways

02 September 2010 / Tom Pangbourne , Julian Miller
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Tax , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Julian Miller & Tom Pangbourne assess the dangers of tax avoidance schemes

Claims against professional advisers in relation to their role in tax avoidance schemes are on the increase. This article examines the basis of such schemes, and why solicitors, barristers and other professionals involved in their implementation may be at risk.

Capital allowances tax reliefs

A number of capital allowance tax reliefs were introduced by the Labour government after 1997 which were designed to encourage investment in particular areas of British industry. This included investment in British films (under s 48 of the Finance (No 2) Act 1998), in technology start-ups (under
s 45 of the Capital Allowances Act 2001) and in research and development (under s 437 Capital Allowances Act 2001). Despite best intentions, inevitably this attracted not just those wishing to invest in the relevant sector but also high net worth individuals seeking to utilise the tax reliefs without any real interest in the underlying asset. This artificiality led to increased scrutiny by HMRC, the gradual restriction of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll