header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010 / Tom Pangbourne , Julian Miller
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Tax , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Look both ways

Julian Miller & Tom Pangbourne assess the dangers of tax avoidance schemes

Claims against professional advisers in relation to their role in tax avoidance schemes are on the increase. This article examines the basis of such schemes, and why solicitors, barristers and other professionals involved in their implementation may be at risk.

Capital allowances tax reliefs

A number of capital allowance tax reliefs were introduced by the Labour government after 1997 which were designed to encourage investment in particular areas of British industry. This included investment in British films (under s 48 of the Finance (No 2) Act 1998), in technology start-ups (under
s 45 of the Capital Allowances Act 2001) and in research and development (under s 437 Capital Allowances Act 2001). Despite best intentions, inevitably this attracted not just those wishing to invest in the relevant sector but also high net worth individuals seeking to utilise the tax reliefs without any real interest in the underlying asset. This artificiality led to increased scrutiny by HMRC, the gradual restriction of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll