header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007 / Tim Taylor
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Loosening the green belt?

Green belts may be back in the news but are they also back up for grabs? asks Tim Taylor

The status of green belts has been the subject of close scrutiny ever since their formal introduction into national planning policy in the Ministry of Housing and Local Government’s Circular 45 in 1954. And, despite vociferous claims to the contrary from a number of interest groups, it must be said that the present incumbent, Planning Policy Guidance Note 2 (PPG 2), could hardly be misread as a welcome sign for prospective developers. Indeed, many who have fallen flat on their faces at this hurdle will testify to this fact. In many ways, any developer wishing to enter the green belt with a spade in one hand and a drawing in the other still does so at his own risk.

MOUNTING PRESSURE

The announcement by the government in summer 2007 for the provision of three million new homes by 2020 has added to the pressure on the green belt and led to calls from concerned

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll