header-logo header-logo

Loosening the green belt?

22 November 2007 / Tim Taylor
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Green belts may be back in the news but are they also back up for grabs? asks Tim Taylor

The status of green belts has been the subject of close scrutiny ever since their formal introduction into national planning policy in the Ministry of Housing and Local Government’s Circular 45 in 1954. And, despite vociferous claims to the contrary from a number of interest groups, it must be said that the present incumbent, Planning Policy Guidance Note 2 (PPG 2), could hardly be misread as a welcome sign for prospective developers. Indeed, many who have fallen flat on their faces at this hurdle will testify to this fact. In many ways, any developer wishing to enter the green belt with a spade in one hand and a drawing in the other still does so at his own risk.

MOUNTING PRESSURE

The announcement by the government in summer 2007 for the provision of three million new homes by 2020 has added to the pressure on the green belt and led to calls from concerned

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll