header-logo header-logo

26 September 2014 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Features , EU , In Court
printer mail-detail

Lord Neuberger on judging & human rights

Professor Michael Zander QC reflects on the significance of Lord Neuberger’s analysis of judging in human rights cases

In an important speech last month that attracted media attention, Lord Neuberger said English judges may have been “too ready to treat Strasbourg court decisions as if they were determinations by a UK court whose decisions were binding on us”.

The President of the Supreme Court was speaking at a judicial seminar in Melbourne on the role of judges in human rights jurisprudence (see www.supremecourt.uk). The speech will have been of interest in Australia where it was given but it may have been aimed even more at readers closer to home (I imagine Lord Neuberger will have been pleased that The Telegraph, for instance, gave it some prominence). Basically he was saying that Strasbourg decisions need not be slavishly followed: “It is a civilian court under enormous pressure, which sits in chambers far more often than in banc, and whose judgments are often initially prepared by staffers,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll