header-logo header-logo

01 January 2009
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Lords unanimous on right to life

Health providers are not outside the reach of Art 2 of the European Convention

The House of Lords has held that a health authority can be liable for a breach of Art 2 (the right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights, and must take reasonable measures to avoid real and immediate risk of harm to patients who have been sectioned.
Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2008] UKHL 74 concerned the death of Carol Savage, who took her own life in 2004 after running away from Runwell Hospital where she had been detained.
The deceased’s daughter,Anna Savage, started proceedings against the trust under the Human Rights Act 1998 on the basis that the trust was a public authority and liable for her mother’s right to life under Art 2, as well as her own right to family life under Art 8.
Previously, the High Court ruled that gross negligence needed to be proved in order for an Art 2 breach to occur. However Anna Savage appealed on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll