header-logo header-logo

06 March 2018
Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Love, marriage, pre-nups & cohabitation rights

While youngsters turn their back on marriage, increasing numbers of more mature men are bucking the trend & getting hitched

Marriage rates for opposite-sex couples are now at their lowest level on record, having declined gradually since the 1970s. However, the latest Office for National Statistics figures show the number of weddings increased for men over 50 and women aged 35-39 years and 45 years and over.

The figures are from 2015 but were released this week. 239,020 opposite-sex couples wed in 2015, a 3.4% decline on 2014—although the ONS speculates that the 2014 figures were boosted by couples delaying marrying in 2013 to avoid the unlucky number 13.

Some 6,493 same-sex couples took advantage of the then recent legislation to wed (gay marriage became possible on 29 March 2014).

Family lawyers warned this week of the dangers of long-term cohabitation, without a legal safety net.

Jo Edwards, head of family at Forsters, said: ‘We are sitting on a ticking time bomb as people sleepwalk their way into cohabiting relationships, without realising that there is no such thing as common law marriage and that they may be severely disadvantaged at the end of the relationship.’

There is also a need to place pre-nuptial agreements on a formal footing, she said. ‘One of the reasons for the phenomenon of "silver splicers" is that around one in three marriages are second marriages as people are living longer, and in turn people feel more readily able to enter into marriage later in life knowing that nuptial agreements are being respected ever more by English courts. But ideally, as the Law Commission proposed in 2014, they should be given a statutory footing so that there is greater clarity in this area.’

Deborah Jeff, partner and head of family at Seddons, said: ‘The best protection is a properly prepared cohabitation agreement, setting out what is intended financially in the event that the relationship ends.

‘But the optimism at the beginning of a relationship means that couples aren’t even considering what happens in a worst case scenario, perhaps mistakenly assuming they are protected by the law in a “common law marriage”. From our recent nationwide polling, only 4% of couples living together had in place a cohabitation agreement, with 79% of cohabiting respondents stating they were not even aware of the existence of cohabitation agreements. 

‘More work and education is needed to ensure couples bear in mind the adage “look before you leap” rather than being left financially disadvantaged if the relationship fails.’

Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll