header-logo header-logo

Lugano membership ‘vital’

30 July 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Brexit
printer mail-detail
It is ‘vital’ that the UK continue her membership of the Lugano Convention, the Lord Mayor of London, William Russell, said at the annual Mansion House Judges’ Dinner, this year held virtually

Continued membership after the transition period ends is necessary not just for our legal services but for all businesses and individuals across the UK and EU, Russell told senior legal professionals attending the event virtually this week. The audience included the Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC, and the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett.

The Lugano Convention governs jurisdiction in cross-border civil and commercial disputes and ensures judgments can be enforced overseas. A number of countries including Norway, Iceland and Switzerland have expressed support for the UK’s intent to accede to the Lugano Convention.

Russell told the audience: ‘Legal services are one of our most-requested exports, a service I champion when promoting the rule of law on my international visits.

‘They play a major role in the attractiveness in the UK as a place to do business. This is why the City of London is proud to support the judiciary and the entire legal sector. Especially right now, at a time when we must be doing everything possible to support our legal services―not to mention our entire economy.

‘It is why we greatly support the UK signing up to the Lugano Convention.’

Giving his speech, Lord Burnett praised judges and court staff for their hard work during the COVID-19 pandemic. He said the delivery of criminal justice has been difficult and will be difficult ‘for the foreseeable future’. However, he said he had been had been heartened by the enthusiasm of lay magistrates to support additional hearings to enable the backlog to be cleared.

On jury trials, Lord Burnett said he did ‘not underestimate the difficulty in putting in place systems which will enable trials to be conducted in sufficient numbers not only to cope with the work flowing into the Crown Court but also to erode the accumulated backlog. 

‘Policy makers and Parliament may yet have to consider radical but temporary measures to aid that process’.

However, he did not refer directly to ministers’ controversial proposals for late and weekend court sittings, which have been opposed by the Bar Council.

Read Lord Burnett’s full speech at: bit.ly/30c16Po.

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Quillon Law—Neil Dooley

Disputes firm expands fraud and investigations practice with partner hire

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Charles Russell Speechlys—Vadim Romanoff

Firm strengthens corporate tax and incentives team with partner hire

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Burges Salmon—Gary Delderfield & Alec Bennett

Partner and senior associate join pensions team

NEWS
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll