header-logo header-logo

Made to order

12 November 2009 / Malcolm Dowden , Saira Malik
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Administration orders “bless” pre-pack information agreements, say Malcolm Dowden & Saira Malik

Legislative policy, embodied in changes made by Insolvency Act 2000 and Enterprise Act 2002, has reduced court involvement in the initiation of insolvency processes. Despite an increase in the number of out-of-court or “self certifying” appointments of administrators, it remains common to apply for an administration order where a “pre-pack” has been agreed as the order “blesses” the arrangement.

In Re Kayley [2009] EWHC 904 (Ch) the court responded to Counsel’s invitation to offer general guidance on pre-pack administrations. The key issue was the type and extent of information required by the court to inform its decision, and the extent to which the court should take an active role in seeking information, rather than leaving disadvantaged creditors to incur the cost and uncertainty of challenge following subsequent disclosure.

The judge acknowledged concerns relating to pre-packs:

A pre-packaged business has not been exposed to the market, which may lead to it being disposed of for less than would have been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll