header-logo header-logo

12 November 2009 / Malcolm Dowden , Saira Malik
Issue: 7393 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Made to order

Administration orders “bless” pre-pack information agreements, say Malcolm Dowden & Saira Malik

Legislative policy, embodied in changes made by Insolvency Act 2000 and Enterprise Act 2002, has reduced court involvement in the initiation of insolvency processes. Despite an increase in the number of out-of-court or “self certifying” appointments of administrators, it remains common to apply for an administration order where a “pre-pack” has been agreed as the order “blesses” the arrangement.

In Re Kayley [2009] EWHC 904 (Ch) the court responded to Counsel’s invitation to offer general guidance on pre-pack administrations. The key issue was the type and extent of information required by the court to inform its decision, and the extent to which the court should take an active role in seeking information, rather than leaving disadvantaged creditors to incur the cost and uncertainty of challenge following subsequent disclosure.

The judge acknowledged concerns relating to pre-packs:

A pre-packaged business has not been exposed to the market, which may lead to it being disposed of for less than would have been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll