header-logo header-logo

Magdalene compensation “less generous”

01 July 2013
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Victims of Catholic laundries to receive pay-out

The Irish government has agreed a payout for victims of the Magdalene laundries.

Thousands of women toiled unpaid under harsh conditions in the Catholic-run laundries, which closed in 1996.

Several hundreds of women may potentially be entitled to a package including compensation of between €11,150–€100,000 depending on length of stay in the laundry, full access to the HAA card (the Health (Amendment) Act 1996 card), and recognition that payments will not affect UK benefits.

The compensation is based on recommendations made in a report by Judge John Quirke, president of the Law Reform Commission.

Patrick Allen, senior partner of Hodge, Jones & Allen, which acted pro bono for the victims, says the announcement has “been a long time coming”.

He said the compensation package was, “at first sight, less generous than the compensation packages offered by the Residential Institutions Redress Board scheme, for those who, as children, were abused while in industrial schools, reformatories and other institutions subject to state regulation or inspection.

“However, the Magdalene payments are increased by the award of a pension payment of €230 per week from pension eligibility age. Also, there appear to be no benefits to families of deceased laundry workers and no legal costs payable to assist applicants to obtain their awards, other than advice on the waiver of claims and to set up a personal injury trust.”

Issue: 7567 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll