header-logo header-logo

06 May 2022 / William Gibson
Issue: 7977 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Magic Circle mergers: taking a Chance

80850
William Gibson charts the history of the law firm merger & reflects on the bold move which started it all

Critics said it would never work. On 2 February 1987, an announcement was made which shocked the upper reaches of the legal profession. On 1 May that year, Coward Chance and Clifford-Turner were to merge to create Clifford Chance and the largest law firm in Britain. Mergers nowadays tend to be foretold and analysed in the legal press long before they happen, but this link had not attracted as much as a whisper—so the news had the effect of a bombshell.

To boldly go…

What was seen by many as an audacious move aroused considerable interest outside the firms, with many ‘management experts’ convinced the new giant would be at risk because lawyers weren’t necessarily good managers. Modern mergers attract professional help from experts from the outset, but in 1987 it was a question of making it up on the hoof.

35 years on, it would appear that something must

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll