header-logo header-logo

15 March 2023
Issue: 8017 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Magistrates' sentencing powers cut

The Magistrates Association has expressed ‘incredible disappointment’ at plans to cut their sentencing powers back from 12 months to six.

The association said it had been ‘assured that the pause is temporary’ and warned it would ‘erode magistrates’ already low morale’.

Magistrates’ sentencing powers were increased from their usual six months to 12 last year by the Lord Chancellor Dominic Raab as part of the drive to reduce the crown court backlog. However, the Ministry of Justice confirmed last week it was reversing the change.

Welcoming the reversal, however, Kirsty Brimelow KC, chair of the Criminal Bar Association, said: ‘As we pointed out in January 2022 [when new powers were announced], increasing magistrates’ sentencing was a bad idea for reasons of increasing short prison sentences; increasing defendants electing to go to crown court, and increasing appeals in crown court.’

Issue: 8017 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll